QuanChanCr7

The food delivery platform DoorDash integrates stablecoin payments on the Tempo blockchain. The food delivery platform DoorDash has officially partnered with the Tempo blockchain to implement stablecoin payments in over 40 countries. DoorDash, one of the largest food delivery and e-commerce platforms in the world, is making headlines by collaborating with the Tempo blockchain to deploy a stablecoin payment infrastructure. According to the announcement, DoorDash will integrate a stablecoin-powered payments system, allowing users, business partners, and drivers (Dashers) to receive and make payments using stablecoins. This solution is expected to be implemented in over 40 countries where DoorDash operates a three-sided ecosystem consisting of consumers, merchants, and delivery personnel. Solving the global payment challenge. With operations spanning multiple markets, DoorDash must simultaneously handle various payment systems, currencies, and legal regulations. This complexity makes the payment process cumbersome, time-consuming, and costly, especially in cross-border transactions. Stablecoins are seen as the solution to this problem. According to a DoorDash representative, using digital assets significantly shortens payment times from several days to just a few seconds, reduces intermediary costs, and mitigates exchange rate volatility risks. DoorDash co-founder Andy Fang stated: In the initial phase, DoorDash will prioritize using stablecoins to pay partners and drivers. In the long run, this system could expand to allow users, stores, and drivers to pay each other directly with stablecoins. Partnering with the Tempo blockchain to build a stablecoin payment infrastructure. To implement this strategy, DoorDash has chosen the Tempo blockchain, which is developed with a focus on payments and is backed by Stripe and Paradigm. According to DoorDash, they chose Tempo because this platform is built to serve large enterprises, featuring characteristics such as near-instant transaction processing, stable transaction fees, and the ability to optimize the payment process for multiple recipients at once. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #TeslaQ1BTCHodlOrFold

New York sues Coinbase and Gemini, tightening prediction market regulations Now it's New York's turn to "intervene" in the prediction market The state of New York has just sued two major crypto exchanges, Coinbase and Gemini, accusing their prediction market products of being essentially illegal gambling activities. According to the lawsuit from the New York Attorney General's Office, the prediction contracts related to sports, entertainment, and elections that Coinbase and Gemini offer fully embody the nature of unlicensed betting activities. The agency argues that the way these platforms operate is no different from a complete betting system. In this system, users act as "bettors," with each contract equivalent to a "bet," while the platform acts as an intermediary similar to a "bookmaker." The issue lies not only in the nature of the product but also in compliance factors. New York accuses these platforms of allowing users aged 18-21 to participate, while state law prohibits mobile betting for those under 21. Attorney General Letitia James's statement clearly reflects the stance: "Gambling, regardless of its name, is still gambling." However, Coinbase and many in the industry counter that the prediction market is a form of a contract trading exchange, similar to derivative products. This viewpoint is supported by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which has repeatedly affirmed that these products fall under federal regulatory authority and has even established a task force to develop policies for the prediction market. Since the end of last year, the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. has sued Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut, forcing the courts to confirm that the prediction market falls under the exclusive regulatory authority of the CFTC. The difference in classification - gambling or finance - is making the prediction market one of the most complex legal gray areas today. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #StrategyBtcYield

Coinbase warns about quantum risks Coinbase's quantum advisory board has just released a new report warning that quantum computing could someday impact cryptocurrency security. There is currently no immediate risk, but the report suggests that the industry should start preparing early. The discussion on Quantum Risks has faced criticism from Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson regarding the security path that Bitcoin has chosen. Coinbase's Quantum report warns of future risks to cryptocurrency security. In a post on X, Coinbase's Chief Strategy Officer, Philip Martin, stated that they have published the first detailed paper on how quantum computers could affect blockchain systems. The advisory board includes researchers from leading institutions such as Stanford, UT Austin, UC Santa Barbara, and Bar-Ilan University, along with experts from major cryptocurrency projects. Experts argue that quantum computing is not yet a direct threat, but it could become a real risk in the future. Current machines are not powerful enough to break the security of blockchain, but this could change in the next decade. The main concern is not the blockchain itself, but the users' wallets. The system proving ownership of funds could become vulnerable, especially for wallets where critical data has been made public. The council emphasizes that the industry should start preparing now, as waiting too long could make the problem much harder to solve. What is really at risk? Not all aspects of cryptocurrency face the same risk. The core systems of Bitcoin, such as mining and transaction history, are generally safe. The main risk lies at the level of digital wallets. About 6.9 million BTC could be exposed because their keys have been made public. If quantum computers become more powerful, they could break these signatures and access the funds. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #WarshDigitalAssets

Analysts believe that XRP could become the default choice for institutions by 2026. According to analysts appearing on The XRP Podcast, XRP is attracting attention from institutional investors, not for speculation, but for what it can actually do. Mr. Mickle, speaking alongside host Paul Barron, stated that large capital allocators are entering the cryptocurrency market through a completely different channel than before. Instead of selecting individual tokens, institutions are now participating through ETF funds and managed products, which has raised the standard for what is being considered. For Mickle, XRP has overcome that barrier. Cross-border payments remain slow and costly across the global banking system, and XRP directly addresses this issue. He argues that this clarity is exactly what decision-makers in institutions are looking for. "XRP will be a very noticeable technology for them in terms of potential application. It perfectly aligns with the challenges these institutions are facing," Mickle said. The influx of capital into ETFs signals a shift in demand. ETF funds linked to XRP have recorded an inflow of $1.28 billion over eight consecutive days, a growth that Mickle describes as structurally significant rather than just a temporary fluctuation. He noted that once an asset is brought into the ETF framework, it shifts from a speculative position to a portfolio allocation decision. This change significantly expands the number of qualified buyers, especially for funds and institutions that cannot justify direct exposure to the token. According to Mickle, XRP ETF funds are increasingly appearing alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum in institutional discussions, indicating that this asset is gradually becoming mainstream in building cryptocurrency portfolios. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #StrategyBtcYield

U.S. Admiral Samuel Paparo: Bitcoin plays an important role in cybersecurity U.S. General: Bitcoin is a cybersecurity tool At a hearing of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, Admiral Samuel Paparo made notable remarks about the role of Bitcoin. He stated that Bitcoin is not just a financial asset, but also a "valuable computer science tool" serving national security. U.S. General: Bitcoin is a cybersecurity tool At a hearing of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, Admiral Samuel Paparo made notable remarks about the role of Bitcoin. He stated that Bitcoin is not just a financial asset, but also a "valuable computer science tool" serving national security. This statement reflects a new perspective from the U.S. military, as blockchain technology begins to be seen as part of a digital defense strategy. Proof of Work and deterrence in cyberspace According to Paparo, the core point lies in the Proof of Work mechanism, which requires real energy consumption to validate data. This helps create tangible costs for cyberattacks, rather than being almost free as it is now with forms like phishing, ransomware, or DDoS. This viewpoint aligns with research by Jason Lowery, who previously argued that Bitcoin could protect all types of data, signals, and control systems, not just currency. In the context of state-sponsored hacker groups like Lazarus continuously attacking infrastructure, applying the "increased attack cost" model is becoming increasingly important. Bitcoin in the global strategic competition These statements come amid intensifying geopolitical competition, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Currently, the U.S. holds the largest amount of Bitcoin among nations and has a high share of global hashrate, but still relies on mining equipment produced abroad, creating supply chain risks. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #StrategyBtcYield

Solana is accelerating rapidly, surpassing Ethereum in transactions Developers are becoming the "engine" of blockchain growth In the crypto market, developer activity and on-chain activity always go hand in hand. When a blockchain attracts more developers, the application ecosystem expands, leading to increased transaction volume and actual usage levels. New data shows that Solana (SOL) has attracted 4,100 new developers, raising its market share to 23%, while Ethereum (ETH) has recorded a decline. This indicates that Solana's growth momentum is coming from real builders, rather than just speculative capital. The on-chain gap between Solana and Ethereum is widening This difference is clearly reflected in on-chain data. In Q1, Ethereum recorded about 200 million transactions, the highest in history. However, Solana far surpassed this with 25.3 billion transactions, which is more than 125 times Ethereum during the same period. This gap reflects a reality: more developers mean more applications, more experiments, and more users, thus creating a growth loop for the ecosystem. Stablecoins and the SOL/ETH pricing puzzle The expansion of Solana is inseparable from stablecoins – a factor providing liquidity for DeFi and payments. According to co-founder Raj Gokal, the volume of stablecoins on Solana has reached nearly $1 trillion/month, equivalent to a growth of about 12 times compared to the same period last year. However, despite the superior on-chain fundamentals, the SOL/ETH ratio has decreased by about 5.84% in Q1, indicating that the market has not fully reflected Solana's fundamental strength. This raises a big question: will the increase in developers and stablecoin liquidity be enough to drive a long-term breakout of SOL against ETH, or will the gap between on-chain data and price continue to persist? $BTC $ETH $RAVE #StrategyBtcYield

Coinbase issues urgent warning about quantum threats to crypto Coinbase warns of quantum risks to crypto Coinbase has just released a new report, emphasizing that while digital assets are currently safe, the crypto industry needs to prepare for risks from quantum computers soon. Coinbase's independent advisory council stated that current quantum computers are not yet powerful enough to break encryption systems, but this could change in the future. Since upgrading blockchains takes a long time, the report stresses that early preparation is essential, rather than waiting until risks materialize. The danger focuses on wallets, not blockchains According to the report, the biggest vulnerability lies not in the blockchain but in the wallets that store assets. Specifically, digital signatures – the factor that confirms ownership – could be compromised if quantum technology becomes powerful enough. Publicly exposed wallets are at higher risk, with an estimated 6.9 million BTC belonging to the vulnerable group. In contrast, core components like Bitcoin mining, hashing functions, or transaction history are assessed as not facing significant risks. However, Proof-of-Stake networks like Ethereum (ETH) have additional weaknesses related to the validator's signature mechanism. Challenges of implementation and the upgrade race Although quantum-resistant algorithms exist, the biggest issue is implementation on an industry-wide scale. New solutions require larger data, which could affect transaction speed, storage, and network performance. Additionally, upgrading millions of wallets requires proactive user participation, making coordination difficult. Currently, many networks have begun to take action: Bitcoin is researching new addresses, Ethereum is building an upgrade roadmap, while Solana, Aptos, and Layer 2 solutions like Optimism are also testing solutions. Notably, Ripple aims to implement a quantum-resistant XRP Ledger by 2028, while research from Google Quantum AI indicates that only about 500,000 qubits could break current encryption standards. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #StrategyBtcYield

Revealing the altcoin with the most active users last week: Who is leading? The crypto user landscape: Layer 1 and Layer 2 dominate A new dataset on weekly active users (WAU) has unveiled the real picture of blockchain usage. The results show a strong concentration in Layer 1 and Layer 2 ecosystems, which attract a large number of real users rather than just speculative capital. Leading the pack is BNB Chain (BNB) with 17.2 million users (+2.5%), followed by Solana (SOL) with 10.2 million (+8.2%) and Tron (TRX) with 6.8 million (+6.4%). These are all ecosystems with low fees, high speeds, and a focus on real-world applications. A clear divide between growth and decline Some platforms continue to maintain steady growth, such as Aptos (APT) (3.5 million, +1.6%), Celo (CELO) (1.2 million, +5%), and PancakeSwap (CAKE) (1.3 million, +7.2%). In contrast, many major ecosystems have recorded significant declines. Ethereum (ETH) dropped by -22.3%, Polygon (POL) fell by -27.3%, while Sei Network (SEI) plummeted by -54.5%. Even Bitcoin (BTC) saw a slight decrease of -4.5%, indicating a clear shift in on-chain activity. Capital is moving towards places with real users This list reflects an important trend: the market is prioritizing ecosystems with real users and high activity, rather than relying solely on narratives. Platforms like opBNB (5.8 million, -1%) and Base (1.6 million, -21.5%) show the increasingly fierce competition in the Layer 2 space. Overall, the WAU data reveals a clear reality: the blockchain race is shifting from "token price" to "actual usage levels," and projects that retain users will have a significant advantage in the long run. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #WarshDigitalAssets

Security Warning: Altcoin has a major vulnerability but the dev is suspected of "overlooking" Serious vulnerability in the Cosmos network A serious security vulnerability has just been discovered in the Cosmos (ATOM) ecosystem, raising significant concerns within the community. Security researcher Doyeon Park has disclosed a "0-day" vulnerability in CometBFT – a critical component of the consensus mechanism. This vulnerability is rated at CVSS 7.1 (critical) and could cause nodes to hang during the block synchronization process. Although it does not directly lead to asset loss, the incident could impact a system protecting over 8 billion USD, causing widespread operational disruptions. Controversy over the disclosure of the vulnerability According to Park, the vulnerability was initially handled through a responsible disclosure process (CVD), but was made public early due to a lack of cooperation from the development team. The researcher stated that the developers believed the flaw was "not exploitable," but did not provide a detailed explanation. Subsequently, Park provided PoC evidence at the network level, demonstrating that the vulnerability could be exploited, but did not receive any further feedback. Additionally, a previously related vulnerability (CVE-2025-24371) rated as "low" has also sparked controversy, as Park argued that this does not meet international standards. Warnings for validators and operational risks After the incident was disclosed, a "survival guide" was released for validators in the Cosmos network. Accordingly, operators are advised not to restart nodes, as the vulnerability is primarily triggered during the data resynchronization process. Nodes that are currently operating normally can continue, but if restarted and connected to a malicious node, they risk hanging and being unable to rejoin the network. This incident highlights a major issue in crypto: even if assets are not stolen, operational and consensus risks can still severely impact the entire ecosystem. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #WarshDigitalAssets

Surprising: The U.S. military considers the application of Bitcoin The U.S. views Bitcoin as a cybersecurity tool The perspective on Bitcoin is gradually changing as the U.S. military begins to see it not just as a financial asset but also as a network defense tool. At a hearing of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, Commander Samuel Paparo stated that Bitcoin plays an important role due to its Proof of Work mechanism. This statement indicates a new approach: Bitcoin could play a role in digital defense strategy. Proof of Work: turning cyber attacks into real costs One of the biggest issues in cyberspace today is that the cost of attacks is nearly zero, making activities like spam or ransomware easy to proliferate. Bitcoin, through its Proof of Work mechanism, can change this by requiring real energy expenditure to validate data. This means that every action in cyberspace must come at the cost of physical resources, forcing attackers to incur clear costs for each attack. This idea is developed from research by Jason Lowery, who views Bitcoin as a form of "electronic security technology" rather than just currency. Geopolitical competition surrounding Bitcoin This new perspective becomes increasingly important in the context of tensions in the Indo-Pacific region. Currently, the U.S. holds a leading position in global Bitcoin hashrate, while owning about 328,000 BTC. Meanwhile, China is believed to hold around 190,000 BTC from previous seizures. This competition shows that Bitcoin is not just an investment asset, but it could also become part of national security and technological power strategy in the future. $BTC $ETH $RAVE #WarshDigitalAssets